The Onion is always good for a laugh!
Labels: misc.
Smoked Ligaments Not A Good Idea
This study from Washington University in St Louis found that exposing mice to smoke resulted in significantly decreased healing in medial collateral ligaments. While the news bit mentions that smoking among athletes is lower than the population, I can think of one population who suffers ligament injuries quite often, and smokes quite a bit. Soldiers.
Don’t we pay for their medical care through our taxes?
When will the military decide the costs of smoking are too high to allow it to occur?
This news report from 1995 seems to have been a bunch of smoke and mirrors.
Labels: public health
An Economist Checks In on Health Care
I like to keep a lookout for when the smart economists provide some of their thoughts on health care. Ultimately, it is these economists that the government consults with to initiate ideas about how to manage our health care system.
Tyler Cowen, a well respected economist, checks in with a piece called, Smart thoughts on health care. He doesn’t say too much, but it sure sparked a conversation in the comments!
When I read this, I try to read between the lines about what people are saying and see how Physical Therapists might act to fill a need economically.
My favorite line from the comments:
"90% of the time I see a doctor it’s to tell them, "I have X, and I need a prescription for Y." After reviewing my symptoms and medical history they always agree with me and write me the prescription. So why am I paying an extra ~$100 just to get a medication I already knew I needed, for a condition I already knew I had, before seeing the doctor? It’s just a waste of my time and money."
Perhaps it is this lack of perceived value in routine care which prohibits a move to a retail-like system.
Labels: health policy
Some News and a Thought
I have been writing my blog, NPA Think Tank for less than one year. In that short time, I have been fortunate enough to get some good exposure and a fairly loyal audience. The Evidence in Motion Group has been very helpful in support of my pursuit.
To them, and my readers, I ‘d like to say, "Thank You!"
Today, I’m happy to announce that my blog posts about Physical Therapy will begin co-appearing directly on the Evidence in Motion Blog at MyPhysicalTherapySpace.com. I’m excited for a new level of exposure and for a new audience. NPA Think Tank will still have some posts unique to it, which will help fulfill the "healthy living… and a vast array of seemingly random topics" part of my tag line.
I have also begun helping out with the Physiospot Musculoskeletal Blog, which is working to be a resource to deliver updates of new research as it breaks. This is part of a collection of sites worth a visit for Physical Therapists. Their tag line: "Assisting health practitioners with evidence based practice and continued professional development." Physio implying a Canadian-based site in this case.
Finally, and hopefully your still with me, I will direct you to an interesting editorial that appeared in this month’s issue of Contraception, An International Reproductive Health Journal. (Please, do not read into this…visiting just by chance!) Anyway, the editorial entitled, "Why We Need to Truly Understand the Medical Literature", lets the audience in on "One of the best kept secrets among health care providers…"
The secret: Many healthcare providers— especially medical doctors — do not have the ability to understand and interpret the medical literature. I liked the article because it brings up some good questions about training future providers in topics of critical appraisal and evidence-based practice principles.
Eric
Labels: physical therapy, Research, Science Literacy
Oh Brother! "PT's Do Research?"
Teaser: Find out what one MD thinks of Physical Therapy! Please read the whole story: Kind of longish, but entertaining never-the-less.
Recently, my work environment has changed. I’m no longer in the traditional outpatient setting. I have been shifted to a clinic that exclusively treats military trainees. I’m still deciding if I enjoy it or not, but my new office mate has proven to be rather thought provoking.
I now share an office with a Physician. The simple fact that I share an office in this way speaks about how Physical Therapists are perceived differently in the Army vs. civilian life, where I would never be allowed to have a key to the proverbial "Physician’s Lounge." Anyway, this guy, an elder fellow who’s a Family Practice doc, has taken it upon himself to challenge my brain every few minutes. For some, this might be tortuous. For me: Game On!
We have each had our share of victories and defeats thus far. He usually sets me up for wrong answers, so I expect my winning % to increase once I recognize his lead-ins more quickly. Anyway, he loves to impress me with his medical knowledge base. Occasionally, I get to teach him something.
I was reading this very useful case series from the latest JMMT issue. The article is a good representation of how back pain is treated in the hands of expert Physical Therapists. Included is a nice chart about how certain symptoms lead to certain treatments and so forth. I explained this chart to my office mate and answered some of his questions about the research supporting it. His response was mostly quiet, which I have come to take as a sign of my victory in our virtual battle of wits. I sat back happy and gave myself a pat on the back. Unaware that his greatest and most vicious attack yet was pending.
Several hours later over lunch he states, "That article was pretty interesting."
Still I think I’m winning.
He continues, "You know, I never new Physical Therapists did that."
I smirk, "What, classify types of back impairments and treat accordingly with specific, focused treatments because they are backed by scientific evidence?"
"No. I didn’t think you guys did research." He was being totally serious.
I walked away in stinging defeat. This story is sadly humorous, and of course, limited to this one doctor. But, how many more physicians have the same opinion as my witty office mate?
Lesson Learned: Talk about the research you read. It not only shows others that you personally are well read, it impresses them about the entire field of Physical Therapy. And, as this points out, we need all the good PR we can get.
Labels: physical therapy, PT Publicity Project, Research
A Sports Cream Fatality
The sad case of Arielle Newman proves that anything taken in excess can be bad. I have never seen the benefit of sports creams, instead using self-remedies such as stretching and relaxation, maybe an ibuprofen here and there. I could never imagine that sports creams’ active ingredient could ever cause some one’s death!
In other news, check out my shared items section of the sidebar. I marked a number of New York Times Health articles about healthcare: spending, reform, and risk-benefit calculations. If your reading this blog via e-mail, this means that you need to click the link at the top of this page and go to the NPA Think Tank website.
Labels: current press, public health
How to Permanently Archive Feed Items
I had the opportunity to present to some faculty and students last week on the relationship between good evidence based practice and internet technology. The topic was mainly about using RSS feeds to collect information that could then be used to improve your clinical practice. i called it, Evidence at Your Fingertips: Leveraging Internet Technology to Improve Evidence-Based Practice Skills.
While the simple fact that you are reading this blog indicates you may know a bit about RSS technology, I was a little surprised that the the vast majority of the audience did not. To techies and bloggers, RSS is part of everyday life and so it was unexpected that a whole room of students and faculty did not use it, but that was the case. I hope that I was able to spread a little RSS interest through my presentation and now there’s a whole pile of new RSS fans out there.
While the simple fact that you are reading this blog indicates you may know a bit about RSS technology, I was a little surprised that the the vast majority of the audience did not. To techies and bloggers, RSS is part of everyday life and so it was unexpected that a whole room of students and faculty did not use it, but that was the case. I hope that I was able to spread a little RSS interest through my presentation and now there’s a whole pile of new RSS fans out there.
Anyway, to continue my Evidence and Technology topic, I will offer some tips from time to time about using different internet technologies.. Of course, I am no expert on this. If you’re really interested, go check out some posts on the Lifehacker or Lifehack blogs.
My Tip of the Day: Permanently Archiving Feed Items of Interest from Google Reader.
Often I find a post that I really like, but for reasons time or energy related, I just skim the post and pass it by for later reference. Google Reader’s absence of a search component sometimes makes it difficult to find these items for later reference. I have been using a little work around and e-mail creativity to overcome this issue.
- E-mail the post to your self: Google Reader nicely integrates e-mail with a single click. I simply send the post item of interest to myself. It’s helpful to add a bit to the subject when sending the item to help in creating a filter in the next step. I add the letters "GR" to remind me that this e-mail is from Google Reader.
- Create a Filter: In your e-mail client (for me it’s Gmail,) create a filter.
The filter should include both a "to" and "from" address that is your e-mail and whatever you added into the subject field ("GR"). I choose the filter to bypass the in-box and tag it with the term "Google Reader Archive."
I can now freely search all of my saved feeds in G-mail, taking full advantage of Google’s product integration and ample e-mail storage space. Never lose a feed you like again!
By the way, if you use Firefox and Greasemonkey, you can go get the Custom Google Reader Search script.
Labels: Evidence and Technology, physical therapy
Mainstream Media Targets Spinal Fusion
This blog post over at EIM highlighted a decent "PT as an alternative" research article regarding back pain. Simultaneously, I was reading the New York Times and Wall Street Journal Health Blog about the famous geographic variability in spinal fusion rates. The Times piece, entitled, "Healthcare as if costs didn’t matter" made the case that perhaps many of the procedures could be unnecessary. Even more, it ties this issue into the Presidential Campaign. Now that’s an issue at the forefront!
Well, neither piece completed the equation that Physical Therapy might be the alternative the market is looking for (but doesn’t yet realize it.) However, there were some comments on the WSJ post that rather progressively mentioned Evidence-Based Practice. I lack the marketing power or savvy I presume it would require, but it would be great to jump all over the topic from a PT marketing standpoint.
It would be amazing if the spinal surgery issue became the "poster child" for healthcare reform and the profession of Physical Therapy was ready to pounce and announce to the world that we have the low cost solution!
Are we ready??? Who’s with me?
Labels: health policy, physical therapy, PT Publicity Project
The Solution for Elderly Driving Woes
Always up for noble research investigations, Yale University researchers have been studying elderly driving. Elderly driving, of course, frightens me. All too often a senior citizen finds themselves slamming on the brake, only to maroon their sedan halfway up a tree by hitting the gas instead!
The research sent elder drivers to a Physical Therapist who enacted a supervised physical fitness program. Not surprisingly, the participants in the experimental group improved their driving skills.
The fit elders also had a reduced risk of falls.
Labels: public health, Research
Google's Frantic Pace
Google has a reputation for doing things differently, such as innovative workplace design. I was reading this piece in the New York Times about how Google continually tweaks its search engine to improve it. The man featured in the article, Amit Singhal, is the master of Google’s search ranking algorithm. For anyone who knows even a bit about Google, this guy is pretty high up.
In the article, Mr. Singhal attributed much of Google’s success to their relatively "breakneck" pace of research in contrast to the more leisurely pace observed at universities and institutions.
“I spent the first three months saying, ‘I have an idea,’ ” he recalls. “And they’d say, ‘We’ve thought of that and it’s already in there,’ or ‘It doesn’t work.’ ”
Now, while this is the technology field we’re talking about here, I can’t help but to think about this issue in terms of healthcare research. Yeah, healing occurs over time and human research has its own time limitations; but I think we must ask ourselves, "Can we do more research in less time?" How is it that some investigators seem to have several publications per year and others once every couple years?
Perhaps it is simply a case of some researchers behaving more like Google, and others behaving more like…well, a researcher. I can imagine researchers dealing with issues of project management, technology assistance, quality, and maybe even figuring out how to exist on 4 hours of sleep. Admittedly, I am not a researcher and am only surmising here.
Here is my own example of how research sometimes proceeds slowly:
I’m writing a case series about a group of patients at my work. In order to proceed, I need to contact our institution’s Department of Clinical Investigation. They have a series of hoops and trainings to jump through, checklists to complete, and signatures to obtain. All to perform a formal write up of treatments that have already happened. They estimate this process takes 1 month to complete.
Grrrr. I could have been finished in 1 month!
Labels: Evidence and Technology, Research