Comparative Visual Healthcare Spending

This is interesting: MSNBC did some calculations of the US budget and presented it in terms of a $1000 household budget. Most of your tax dollars go to finance healthcare. Personally disturbing for me, b/c I spent less than $400 on healthcare for myself last year!

For the picture, click here.

I wonder how much we could deduct off that amount if no needless MRI’s were performed. (see previous post)

Why Referal for Profit is Dangerous and Thoughts on Radiology

Yesterday, the journal, Health Affairs, published a study that investigated referral for profit in the context of advanced radiological imaging. Here is what they found:

ABSTRACT:

Using data from a large insurer in California, we identified the self-referral status of providers who billed for advanced imaging in 2004. Nearly 33 percent of providers who submitted bills for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, 22 percent of those who submitted bills for computed tomography (CT) scans, and 17 percent of those who submitted bills for positron-emission tomography (PET) scans were classified as “self-referral.” Among them, 61 percent of those who billed for MRI and 64 percent of those who billed for CT did not own the imaging equipment. Rather, they were involved in lease or payment-per-scan referral arrangements that might violate federal and state laws. [Health Affairs 26, no. 3 (2007): w415-w424 (published online 17 April 2007; 10.1377/hlthaff.26.3.w415)]


In other words, and put less politely, 60% of doctors were illegally billing for imaging studies. As you know, MRI and CT scans are expensive, often over $1000. The ability of a doctor to be paid for a test like this is just way to fishy for me. I wonder if the patients sent for theses images have the ignorant good fortune to hear, “Good news, your MRI was negative!” more than those patients whose doctors were not getting illegal kickbacks.

The proper use of advanced imaging is to rule in/out a diagnosis. The overuse of these images is rampant, as many people just order the image to “see what’s going on in there” as opposed to performing a thorough and telling clinical exam.

Another excerpt from the article:

“Under federal law, it is generally illegal for a physician to refer Medicare or Medicaid patients for designated health services in which the physician has a financial interest. Nearly half of the states have similar prohibitions that apply to the privately insured. These bans on self-referral were enacted during the early 1990s in response to several empirical studies that found that the financial incentives inherent in physician self-referral arrangements resulted in increased use of services and higher payments from third-party payers.”
Ok, so my question now becomes two-fold:
  1. What is going to be done about this, because I’m sure there is a lot of needless expense in overuse of advanced imaging?
  2. Why is this referral for profit ban NOT inclusive of Physical Therapy? Why is it ok for a doctor to profit from self-referrals to his PT, but not from an MRI?

I guess this is just another bit of evidence for why we should, as a society, increase our skepticism of the medical profession. They are, after all, human. Check out the WSJ Health Blog on this subject.

Why this Plica makes me sad…

Today a patient came to see me with knee pain that she’s had for over 6 months. She had been to see a variety of care providers at different locations around the globe. Radiological imaging was performed and the resounding result of all her previous exams and imaging was “Nothing Found.”

Usually I get defensive when a patient with this background comes in, as it triggers my “scammer alert” instincts. Upon interviewing this patient it immediately became clear that she was in legitimate pain and was frustrated that “no one can see it, feel it or tell me what’s wrong, but I just know it hurts.” Game on!
The interview revealed she could run 2 miles very quickly, but has some pain after, stairs frightened her, and sitting in meetings really hurt. My physical exam lasted all of about 3 minutes, including several special tests to rule out any injuries not suggested by her history. She had a patella plica. (And here.)
This is a small fold of soft tissue that everyone has between the kneecap and femur. In some cases, it becomes angry and hurts. It is not uncommon and is really a simple diagnosis to make. Her treatment would include some basic stretching and strengthening, and a referral to an orthopedist for a steroid injection. With any luck we can avoid surgery. Her prognosis is good.
So what makes me sad about this plica? The fact that no less than 5 physicians examined this knee without findings and this poor girl was labeled as a scammer. This story underscores the importance of seeing a musculoskeletal expert for musculoskeletal pain.
Who are these experts? Physical Therapists and Orthopedic Surgeons. That’s it.

God Bless You, Mr. Vonnegut…


Kurt Vonnegut has died. He split his head in a fall and last night he died. And so it goes…

“When the last living thing

has died on account of us,

how poetical it would be

if Earth could say,

in a voice floating up

perhaps

from the floor

of the Grand Canyon,

“It is done.”

People did not like it here.”

Labels:

Can Exercise Help Breast Cancer?

Perhaps not directly, but a recent BMJ article says it can help in improving physical function and quality of life measures in patients with early stage breast cancer. Some of the physical measures noted were a 12 minute walk test and a measurement of shoulder mobility. Interesting to note, the physical measures improved right away, but it took some time for the quality of life measures to show an intervention effect.

There have been a series of studies (and this one) recently dealing with the issue. I find the concept refreshing, as it really makes sense to get some supportive literature behind some good integrative care. Perhaps with enough of this type of literature, a woman diagnosed with breast cancer will be able to receive treatment not just for her cancer, but also for her receding quality of life and upper limb function…and have it reimbursed!

There's a Fungus Among Us!

I may have mentioned this in a previous post, but this article provided a nice overview of the events surrounding the emergence of a potentially fatal fungus in the Pacific Northwest.

A quote from the article:

“An alien fungus took root on Vancouver Island eight years ago and has since killed eight people and infected at least 163 others, as well as many animals.”

Patient Conversation of the Week

Excerpts from especially memorable patient encounters:

ME: So what made your back pain worse?

Patient: The Physical Therapy made is worse.

ME: Well, what did you do in PT?

Patient: What they told me to do.

ME: What did they tell you to do?

Patient: Things that hurt.

Excellent!

Labels:

Here Comes Google!

Google asks an open question about finding quality healthcare information. The post has serious implications about the future of how patients can learn about their conditions, doctors, and choices.
A while back I also observed a post on health information and evidence from Google. It is clear they are making a plan to be a source of quality health information. I suspect Google will probably change the way patients and doctors interact if able to “smarten-up” healthcare consumers. They want your feedback, so go drop them a line!

Labels: , ,

Why Do They Smoke?

I started thinking about this the other day while hanging out with friends…who were smoking. I was wondering why so many young people I know smoke in light of such very strong evidence not to. I put the thought away, until a very nice conversation I had today motivated me to write about it.
This report confirms my personal observation, that even while overall smoking rates decline, the rate of smoking among young adults is climbing! I just can’t understand.
I guess I will not spend too much time trying to figure out this complex problem, but my message today will be:
In order to change behavior, sometimes more than just good evidence is needed. Often it takes a driving, deeply motivating issue to enact that change.

Labels: ,