Connecting PT's

A month or so back, I wrote a post urging Physical Therapists to become more active in the blogosphere.  I highlighted a few blogs that were new to the scene, but was very pleased when my comments became a buzz of activity with PT’s reaching out to let me know of their existence in the world of blogs.

Here is a list of the sites I’ve had time to check out.  You will notice that this list has some active blogs, and some less frequently updated sites.  You will also notice that the content of these blogs is very diverse, with a large portion of them related to pain science.  Finally, yes, there are women PT bloggers!!  I’m sure there are some more blogs out there, but I got a little dizzy trying to determine which blogs were active, which were proposed blogs, and which were abandoned.  If I left you off the list, do not be offended, just send a note and I’ll update it.

Check em Out! (in no particular order)

Student PT Blog

Orthopaedic Physical Therapy Blog

Humanantigravitysuit (which includes a very interesting tag line: From the Vantage Point of a Professional Human Primate Social Groomer, or "Neuroplastician")

TherExtras The "truth about healthcare and therapy for children with disabilities"

Gaston Rehab Associates Blog

Neurotonics: a PT Team Blog

The Neurotopian

Strengthen your Health

Soma Simple Forums

Rehab Edge

Apparently, I’m not the only one who wonders about PT’s uptake of Internet technology.  One blogger wrote regarding PT’s web use:

"The resistance to any use of the web is beyond your imagining" Barrett Dorko

 

As a side note, several of the comments referred to John Duffy’s PT Update site as a precursor to current blogging efforts.  Perhaps, although the paid subscription model keeps him firmly on the Web 1.0 side of the web universe.

ERIC

Do Physicians Need to Tell Physical Therapists What To Do?

ResearchBlogging.org

As a physical therapist on the forefront of the profession’s movement towards autonomous practice, I often find myself confronted with the fact that physicians don’t have a blue print of APTA’s Vision 2020 in their daily planner.  Which means that sometimes a physician will treat a physical therapist more like a worker than a professional.  On one side of the spectrum, and similar to my experience working in the Army health care system, some physicians treat physical therapists as colleagues, often asking for input on patient appropriateness, diagnosis, and dictating open-ended referrals.  Alternatively, and not 20 miles down the road, I live near some very conservative, old southern physicians who would gladly have me shine their shoes and wax their car when I’m done applying the moist heat and ultrasound.  I expect the norm across the United States lies somewhere in between these two extremes. 

Shoeshineparlor
The opinions of most physicians can be observed in the type of referral they write to physical therapy.  I either get an consult-ish, "evaluate and treat" open referral, or a more prescriptive, "3x/week, 4 weeks, hot pack, ultrasound, strengthening" referral.  From my perspective, I only need the first kind, as I know how to do my own job.  A prescriptive consult between physicians is unheard of.  Imagine a family medicine doc sending a referral to an orthopaedic surgeon that read, "Shoulder pain, instability, please perform capsular shift and progress with conservative strengthening protocol over 8 weeks!"  The open consult is more consistent with autonomous physical therapist practice.

How can we reconcile these two types of physician referrals?  I am strongly biased towards the open referral type, but can research tell us anything about which of these two attitudes result in the best patient care?  Gary Brooks and colleagues hypothesized that a prescriptive referral would result in a higher utilization of resources by reasoning "that prescriptive referrals oblige therapists to negotiate patient management issues with physicians, creating a greater administrative burden that may be reflected by a higher number of patient visits."

In their research, which was limited by a very low inclusion of patient records (6.8% of eligible subjects) this hypothesis was not supported.  What they did find, was that the type of referral was not associated with number of visits, but was attached to a greater level of discharge disability.  This study can then add to the argument that a prescriptive referral is of no extra help in the provision of physical therapy services, and might be associated with poorer patient outcomes.

Link to Abstract

I would have liked to see a greater sample size, but this was limited as most eligible records were incomplete due to patients not completing their physical therapy sessions and so discharge data was often missing.  That is a shame, because research like this can really help to reconcile some differences with physical therapist-physician relationships.  I wonder if the subjects in the study had deemed themselves ready for discharge prior to the physical therapist considering them as such.  If so, did this study churn up a practice pattern of generalized over-utilization by physical therapists as they string out patient visits?  It’s possible, and much more likely when the physician dictates an arbitrary number of visits irrespective of patient progress.

My conclusions:  I continue to consider open referrals more appropriate, with some small exceptions for post-surgical protocols of complicated surgeries.  I now have this bit of research in my pocket that tells me the prescriptive referral is at least no better.  I look forward to more research of this type that also delineates the differences when physical therapist expertise is factored into the mix.

As an aside, when I posed the question that is this post’s title to one of my first year PT students, she reflexively responded, "NO!"  I look forward to the day when a medical student might answer the same question in the same manner.  Then, we would be getting somewhere.

ERIC

Brooks, G. (2008). Is a Prescriptive or an Open Referral Related to Physical Therapy Outcomes in Patients With Lumbar Spine-Related Problems?. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, 38(3), 109-115. DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2008.2591

Roentgen Ray Fun

Thumbsup

If you have some extra time, take a stroll through Flickr’s Nasty X-ray pool.  There are some beauties in there.  I especially liked the decomposition and miter saw radiographs.

This fellow would like to give it 2-thumbs up, but is having some difficulty!

Robert C. Byrd's Tumble

US Sen Robert C Byrd fell down in his home and is scheduled for some physical therapy.  Sen Byrd will receive his rehab to improve his balance at Walter Reed Army Medical Center.  I expect he will have a great experience, and will be in good hands as his physical therapist works to reduce his fall risk. 

You can read about the Walter Reed Physical Therapy Staff here.  Excellent credentials, but sadly no faces or names!

Washington State Physical Therapists Go to Battle

Columbia Physical Therapy in Washington State has filed a lawsuit against Benton Franklin Orthopedic, a group of orthopaedic surgeons, in what figures to be the next big referral-for-profit / physician-owned battle in the physical therapy profession.  The physical therapists have an interesting set of laws on their side, the physicians have the normal repertoire of “doctor’s know best” arguments on their side.

However, the attorney for the orthopaedic group might have underscored the position of desperation his clients may be in with this quote:

“If physicians can’t employ physical therapists, nobody can, and they are used in all sorts of medical settings.”

That has to be the craziest argument in favor of physician self-referral yet.  No one can get physical therapist interventions if they are not employed by a doctor?  This assumption of employment visible in the quote underscores the widely held belief that many physicians hold about physical therapists, that they are an auxiliary service rather than an independent medical professional of similar value and capability in the care of musculoskeletal conditions.  Perhaps physical therapists’ fondness for video games assists in perpetuating this belief.

In a stone-cold logical retort, Columbia Physical Therapy’s attorney states his client’s problem with physician self-referral as he describes the practice as having the ability to “create a captive referral market where the referring physician controls both the supply and the demand for patient services.”

Captive markets are dangerous for consumers.  Does that mean that all individuals take advantage?  Not at all.  There are some high-quality physician-owned groups out there.  In fact, I met one last night!  However, the danger lies in the possibility of abuse which is something our health care system should have very little tolerance for.

ERIC

Oh Brother! Still the Wii?

Angry_man
My fear of having non-fitness personnel take up the profession of Wiihab is coming closer to fruition as Nintendo has announced a Fitness package which will include a balance board.  Nintendo itself is spearheading the effort into the fitness industry.

The APTA is very typically all excited about this gimmick and announced their new love affair in this week’s news:

"Look
for an upcoming article in the May issue of
PT Magazine about PTs who have used the Wii as part of
patient care."

How many people in the world can do Wiihab without having to spend time getting a doctoral degree?  Exactly!  So should this be something physical therapists do?  This is very similar to going to see a physical therapist and getting put on an exercise bike for a half hour.  Yes, within our scope of practice, but not good practice.  If I was a patient and hurt my shoulder only to be put on a Wii-regimen…well, I’m not coming back.

I’ve got a bad feeling about this. 
ERIC

Muscle Cramps!

Tetanus
I have a penchant for enjoying things that are often ubiquitous, yet poorly understood.  The human body is ripe with these topics.  Among my favorites are delayed onset muscle soreness, muscle fatigue, and muscle cramps. 

Muscle cramps are often extremely painful and debilitating.  I remember struggling with quadriceps cramps more than one time while cycling.  The worst time was on the return leg of a 80 mile trek through the mountains (relative, I know, but surprisingly steep) of northwest NJ on a hot summer day.  The cramps began at mile 42.  I remember completing the rest of the ride in fear because a feature of muscle cramps poorly appreciated among non-cyclists is that when you do cramp, your foot is mechanically secured to the pedal.  Avoiding a crash and somehow gaining enough control of your tetanic leg to unclip from your pedals is a true miracle!

I enjoyed this recent article in the New York Times, which provides a nice overview of some competing theories behind the daunting muscle cramp.  Featured in the article is one of my colleagues at the Medical College of Georgia, Dr. Michael F. Bergeron, who runs the environmental physiology lab and calls the physical therapy department his home.  He discusses a specific type of cramp related to excessive sweating. 

Dr. Bergeron, incidentally, had an enviable week in the media, also making an appearance in a Times Magazine article, "Little Athletes Big Injuries."

The next time you have a muscle cramp, perhaps thoughts of the scientific wonder that they are will help ease your suffering. 

Yeah, right!

ERIC

The Big Rip-Off

Linking to this NYT’s editorial about the lawsuit between the State of NY and Ingenix seems the thing for PT blogs to do today, so I will not disappoint.

"Mr. Cuomo and the American Medical Association, which has a
long-standing suit filed against Ingenix and various UnitedHealth
companies, claim that the data is manipulated. They claim that health
insurers and Ingenix disproportionately eliminate high charges, thus
skewing the numbers for customary charges downward."

But NPA is a Think Tank, and so linking to this editorial is simply not enough.  We need an original thought on the topic.  Here it is:

Where is the APTA on this lawsuit?  Jump on board with the AMA and, in an act of altruistic cooperation, invoke reform of the slimy health insurance nation that surrounds us.

Am I asking too much?  Maybe.  But I’m please to see this issue getting some press.
ERIC

Physical Therapists Now Eligible for Debt Relief

Last week legislation was approved to finally include physical therapists in the list of health

providers eligible for student loan forgiveness.  

"This amendment provides valuable incentives to enter the profession of
physicalDebt_2 therapy and help meet the high demand for physical therapists
that exists across the nation," said American Physical Therapy
Association (APTA) President R Scott Ward, PT, PhD. "Physical
therapists often begin their careers with significant levels of student
loan debt. Offering forgiveness will help enhance physical therapy
availability for children, adolescents and veterans, and provide
lasting health benefits in these areas."

Indeed!  Physical therapists, does this legislation effect you?  It doesn’t help me, but I am only one.  Check in with a comment!

ERIC

The National Wiihab Crisis

Dunce
Most news articles on physical therapists can be found in newspapers by the following categorization:

"Newspaper name / world news / national news / health news / local news / physical therapy news"

No longer, as I found this headline under the "world news" category in the  Atlanta Journal Constitution:

"Forget rehab, try Nintendo Wiihab"

Yikes!!! World news?  Forget Rehab?  Yes, Wiihab is surely helping our professional branding now, isn’t it?

Let’s put a hypothetical example forward.  I’m a random guy with a business background, perhaps a personal trainer, and a half-dozen Nintendo Wii systems.  I’m not a licensed physical therapist, but still I decide to open a Wiihab Center.  I’m not doing physical therapy, I’m not billing for physical therapy…I’m doing "Wiihab."  Wiihab is exercising with a Wii, surely not the intellectual or professional property of the physical therapy profession.  I’m now free to invite all those injured patients who have read about Wiihab in to exercise at my singlularly branded Wii-clinic.

Is this was all those clinics getting press about Wiihab are hoping for?  Obviously, not.  But as Wiihab gets a national branding and enterprising individuals realize that anyone can open a fitness center, how can they stop it?  Won’t they feel like a dunce when a Wiihab shop opens up next door and bills cash at a higher rate than physical therapy reimbursement for therapeutic exercise!

Will the APTA and state chapters spend thousands of legislative dollars trying to get Wiihab added to practice acts, to prevent chiropractors and athletic trainers from performing Wiihab?  I sure hope not.   

The Wiihab crisis…it could be just the beginning.
ERIC

p.s.  I’ve added a Wiihab category to the blog to track my posts about this next big thing in rehab!